Get em in lads

Wph v Mac 

2-0 in both 

Wrr vs NR

4-2 ressies

1-0 fg

NR played some good football in firsts, unlucky not to get a result

1st:

Normo 1 - 2 St Pats

Ressies:

Normo 1 - 1 St Pats

1st:

Normo 1 - 2 St Pats

Ressies:

Normo 1 - 1 St Pats

EEW vs Putney

Ressies:

8-0

First:

5-1

Putney played much better than the scoreline says. A well played and well fought game. Thankyou boys

Is it right it was 1-1 with 5 to go? That's what I've just been told.

Yep^^

Is it right it was 1-1 with 5 to go? That's what I've just been told.

Tiger Tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>EEW vs Putney

>Ressies:

>8-0

>First:

>5-1

>Putney played much better than the scoreline says. A well played and well fought game. Thankyou boys

------------------------------------------

theyve called me a troll in the past but all jokes aside so proud of the lads today, refs up our arses again could have easily been 3-4 to Putney or something but gonna live to regret those missed chances early. Also whoever named themselves Putney Chokers cry more, we'll be back next season.

lukewarm but optimistic regards, Putney Ranger

Tiger Tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>EEW vs Putney

>Ressies:

>8-0

>First:

>5-1

>Putney played much better than the scoreline says. A well played and well fought game. Thankyou boys

------------------------------------------

cheers mate congratulations 

Putney chokers wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Is it right it was 1-1 with 5 to go? That's what I've just been told.

------------------------------------------

dribl says 87', 90', 90+3, 90+5

talk about a collapse

Games in SL only went for 90 mins. How are we meant to know you have to keep playing?!

Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Putney chokers wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Is it right it was 1-1 with 5 to go? That's what I've just been told.

>
------------------------------------------

> 

>dribl says 87', 90', 90+3, 90+5

>talk about a collapse

------------------------------------------

pretty sure Jamie Galluzzo came on 86th minute. I'm sure it's a coincidence though

Not sure why Putney are being called thugs and copping all the stuff they have to date on here. They're quite suited to the PL and seem just fine. Was a great battle today and on another day, it could've fallen their way. I still think we deserved the win, but credit to Putney and the fight they put up. 

Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Putney chokers wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Is it right it was 1-1 with 5 to go? That's what I've just been told.

>
------------------------------------------

> 

>dribl says 87', 90', 90+3, 90+5

>talk about a collapse

------------------------------------------

pretty sure Jamie Galluzzo came on 86th minute. I'm sure it's a coincidence though

To the Putney lads, how about recruit?

you need depth in prems and going off your Ressies results you don't have any...?

you got your oldest player running absolute kms.

It's not Super league, can't get away with 15 players every week..

Tip wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>To the Putney lads, how about recruit?

>you need depth in prems and going off your Ressies results you don't have any...?

>you got your oldest player running absolute kms.

>It's not Super league, can't get away with 15 players every week..

> 

> 

------------------------------------------

got half a squad out injured. 

Black armbands for Putney next weekend. The only club with players out injured in PL history!

Penno v Woodies

1-0 both grades

6 point shutout babyyyyy

Sad to see the downfall of Dragons. Quality not there like they were when they first came up. Players not willing to commit, players injured and if Pats beat them next week, will look a comfortable 9th place for the remainder of the season.

West Penno missing a tone of good chances but were dominant against a depleted side 

The Big Dog wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Not sure why Putney are being called thugs and copping all the stuff they have to date on here. They're quite suited to the PL and seem just fine. Was a great battle today and on another day, it could've fallen their way. I still think we deserved the win, but credit to Putney and the fight they put up. 

------------------------------------------

Apparently they got pulled up early in the season to sort themselves out after engaging in an all-in-brawl during pre season and have since cut down on the whole agro nonsense.

btw Normo beating West Penno last week and then lost to Pats is classic Normo

Rumour wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>The Big Dog wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Not sure why Putney are being called thugs and copping all the stuff they have to date on here. They're quite suited to the PL and seem just fine. Was a great battle today and on another day, it could've fallen their way. I still think we deserved the win, but credit to Putney and the fight they put up. 

>
------------------------------------------

>Apparently they got pulled up early in the season to sort themselves out after engaging in an all-in-brawl during pre season and have since cut down on the whole agro nonsense.

> 

>btw Normo beating West Penno last week and then lost to Pats is classic Normo

------------------------------------------

Normo are such an inconsistent side. When they're on they look like the real deal. But when they're off they look like a bottom 4 side. Never know what you're going to get when you play them