If they manage to get pass both Pittwater RSL and Glebe Gorillas, they could potentially win it...would be interesting who they would come up against later in the draw considering some strong teams are going to be on the exit after the Second Round of the draw.
west penno better of forfetting the 3-0 would look better then the 7-0 those idiot surfys will do to you can watch the live stream of kenthurst lifting the cup i will paste the link hear your all fat
>> ------------------------------------------ I believe round 1 for AA mens is 25/9
> ------------------------------------------
>according to fnsw website round 1 is this weekend
>
>they also have no fixtures up so who knows whats going on over there
>almost as bad as nwsfa
------------------------------------------
The all age starts sept 25 or can't you read? Other groups starting this weekend are littered with byes. Continue to rubbish NWSFA and who looks like the fool now.
Sorry to say but WPH Champions of Champions quest will be cut short against a very good Pittwater who had several players come back to the Squad during the Year.
Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
your all fat im hearing the ghfa loverboys of west pennent hills gave pittwater some shooting practice today time to put down the coke and pies your playing with the big boys now the bush boys into the next round good bye berowera ghfa come learn a thing or too hills comp still number 1
hills comp better then ghfa comp proven it today how do you go to champeons of champeon and loose 4-0 first round if only they had a walking champens of champeons
Rough result wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.------------------------------------------
Blame it on the Flamingo Pink Goalie attire... from head to toe - all pink.
kenthurst keith wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>hills comp better then ghfa comp proven it today how do you go to champeons of champeon and loose 4-0 first round if only they had a walking champens of champeons
------------------------------------------
Guess you've forgetten the last CoC, where kenthurst were knocked out in the 1st round 6-1?
we should of beaten inter that day they were old lucky to win they were anyway stop living in the past your fat and the bush boys are to lift this cup whats gHfa doing for mad monday shouting the west pennent players a pie and a coke at ryde servo come watch the big boys play
we should of beaten inter that day they were old lucky to win they were anyway stop living in the past your fat and the bush boys are to lift this cup whats gHfa doing for mad monday shouting the west pennent players a pie and a coke at ryde servo come watch the big boys play
Rough result wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
------------------------------------------
Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
Said it before and ill say it again. WPH aren't that good. They aren't a good football side. very fir, very well drilled and they are cery good at what they do. More than that, they are consistent and deserved winners of our comp
We know wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>Said it before and ill say it again. WPH aren't that good. They aren't a good football side. very fir, very well drilled and they are cery good at what they do. More than that, they are consistent and deserved winners of our comp
>But they are not a good footballing side
------------------------------------------
"WPH arent that good", well if that's the case, then what does that say about the rest of the competition and presumably your team? Rubbish?
Well drilled and good at what they do. Sounds like they play to their strengths and do it well. Isn't that what it's about? Pittwater wasn't super impressive yesterday but when needed the quality of players that had played at a higher level in their side produced. WPH lacked theri normal fluidity. They weren't bad and 4 shipped was probably reflective of Pittwater quality in front of goal. WPH missed their normal outlet upfront though.
New bushies wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>Rough result wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
> ------------------------------------------
>Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
>"We dominated possession"
>"We had more chances but just couldn't finish"
>"The other team had 4 shots and scored then all"
>
>They're the new kenthurst
------------------------------------------Not sure WPH players or coaching staff have even written anything about the game. I was there just to watch. Considering they only lost about 3 games this year including this one I reckon you're working off a pretty small sample size!
New bushies wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>Rough result wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
> ------------------------------------------
>Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
>"We dominated possession"
>"We had more chances but just couldn't finish"
>"The other team had 4 shots and scored then all"
>
>They're the new kenthurst
------------------------------------------Not sure WPH players or coaching staff have even written anything about the game. I was there just to watch. Considering they only lost about 3 games this year including this one I reckon you're working off a pretty small sample size!
your all fat we marcheing on to the semi finals come down and watch us and take some notes you might learn a thing or too west pennent hills out of the comp for weeks rubbish assosciascion gone backwards since us bush boys have left we carried that premier league now its like a aa5 at best enjoy the pies
kenthurst keith wrote: ------------------------------------------ >
>your all fat we marcheing on to the semi finals come down and watch us and take some notes you might learn a thing or too west pennent hills out of the comp for weeks rubbish assosciascion gone backwards since us bush boys have left we carried that premier league now its like a aa5 at best enjoy the pies
COC's
wrote on 07-Sep-22 13:46WPH v Pittwater RSL - Round 1
M
wrote on 07-Sep-22 14:49A tough round 1. Think WPH have what it takes to make the GF twice in a row?
unlucky draw
wrote on 07-Sep-22 19:10I would say the toughest round 1. Be a good chance of winning if they knock off Pittwater. My money is on the peninsula side though. Going with 3-1
watts
wrote on 08-Sep-22 12:03what's the venue?
where do we find the full draw?
M
wrote on 08-Sep-22 12:46watts wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>what's the venue?
>
>where do we find the full draw?
------------------------------------------
NWSF is the home team round 1, you can see the all age draw on Football NSW's Facebook.
Full draw will be supposedly on Dribl on Friday.
watts
wrote on 09-Sep-22 10:24------------------------------------------
>
>NWSF is the home team round 1, you can see the all age draw on Football NSW's Facebook.
>Full draw will be supposedly on Dribl on Friday.
------------------------------------------
thanks dude
https://www.facebook.com/171869122862129/videos/486641609942552/?__so__=permalink
watts
wrote on 09-Sep-22 10:25is COC for Champions ...or for premiers?
Hype
wrote on 09-Sep-22 10:39Tough draw for WPH. If they can knock off Pittwater they will come up against Eastern Suburbs Premiers Glebe in the 2nd round.
spectator93
wrote on 09-Sep-22 11:28If they manage to get pass both Pittwater RSL and Glebe Gorillas, they could potentially win it...would be interesting who they would come up against later in the draw considering some strong teams are going to be on the exit after the Second Round of the draw.
M.oliver
wrote on 09-Sep-22 11:49How come they dont have Premier of Premiers?
M.oliver
wrote on 09-Sep-22 12:07How come they dont have Premier of Premiers?
spectator93
wrote on 09-Sep-22 12:48Because traditionally in football - the Champions are First on the ladder at the end of the season and not Grand Final winners...duhhhhh
kenthurst keith
wrote on 10-Sep-22 13:06west penno better of forfetting the 3-0 would look better then the 7-0 those idiot surfys will do to you can watch the live stream of kenthurst lifting the cup i will paste the link hear your all fat
Predictions
wrote on 10-Sep-22 13:11Winners in bold
FC Eagles V Banksia
Glebe Gorillas V Bankstown
Kenthurst V Berowra
Narellan V Springwood
Ponds FC V Rydalmere
Yoogali V Bowral
WPH V Pittwater
Hurlstone Park V Kirrawee
Y Man
wrote on 10-Sep-22 15:28Where are they playing..Valentine??
watts
wrote on 12-Sep-22 11:48Kenthurst & District Football Club
Sun 25 Sep12:00 AM
Berowra FC
kenhurst keith,
what's the Venue? KP2?
over estimated
wrote on 13-Sep-22 08:25i think a lot of you are over estimating pittwater
i know they played a couple trials against nwsf teams and werent that great
PecKer
wrote on 13-Sep-22 19:475 days away from COC rd1..no venue published
Juice
wrote on 13-Sep-22 22:05PecKer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>5 days away from COC rd1..no venue published
------------------------------------------
I believe round 1 for AA mens is 25/9
useless
wrote on 14-Sep-22 11:14Juice wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>PecKer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>>5 days away from COC rd1..no venue published
>
------------------------------------------
I believe round 1 for AA mens is 25/9
------------------------------------------
according to fnsw website round 1 is this weekend
they also have no fixtures up so who knows whats going on over there
almost as bad as nwsfa
Draw
wrote on 14-Sep-22 12:20>
------------------------------------------
>according to fnsw website round 1 is this weekend
>
>they also have no fixtures up so who knows whats going on over there
>almost as bad as nwsfa
------------------------------------------
Fixtures can be found here https://competitions.footballnsw.com.au/?competition=RwNl4JANjr&league=RwNlkpMmjr
...But no grounds or times have been added yet.
Junior comps seem to start this weekend, but All Age Men round 1 is on the 25th.
Yes you are useless
wrote on 14-Sep-22 14:10useless wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Juice wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>>PecKer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>>>5 days away from COC rd1..no venue published
>>
------------------------------------------
I believe round 1 for AA mens is 25/9
>
------------------------------------------
>according to fnsw website round 1 is this weekend
>
>they also have no fixtures up so who knows whats going on over there
>almost as bad as nwsfa
------------------------------------------
The all age starts sept 25 or can't you read? Other groups starting this weekend are littered with byes. Continue to rubbish NWSFA and who looks like the fool now.
H
wrote on 19-Sep-22 12:37Sorry to say but WPH Champions of Champions quest will be cut short against a very good Pittwater who had several players come back to the Squad during the Year.
Hard, fast and don't stop for 90 minutes.
Season 2022 Over for WPH.
Keith Urban
wrote on 19-Sep-22 12:43Where are Kenthust playing in Rd 1?? KP2?
Tweet
wrote on 19-Sep-22 17:46West Penno vs Pittwater is at Christie Park @ 2.15pm on Sunday.
Kenthurst vs Berowra 4pm @ Bernie Mullane.
Twit
wrote on 21-Sep-22 20:52Berowra is trying to move their game as most of their squad is on an end of season trip.
watts
wrote on 23-Sep-22 13:35Twit wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Berowra is trying to move their game as most of their squad is on an end of season trip.
------------------------------------------
they can use the ressies
kenthurst keith
wrote on 24-Sep-22 13:01berowera may as well keep there bags packed there going to get a lessen in good football the bush boys are still number 1
2nd place always
wrote on 24-Sep-22 13:26Well no Keith, you're there on charity. You finished 2nd remember lol, loser.
2nd place always
wrote on 25-Sep-22 08:23Well no Keith, you're there on charity. You finished 2nd remember lol, loser.
kenthurst keith
wrote on 25-Sep-22 09:33your an idiot we were the best team in the league everybody new it we gave norwest a hammering and now we will give the champeons of champens a shake
Tough day
wrote on 25-Sep-22 16:47Pittwater 4 wph zip. See you next season.
H
wrote on 25-Sep-22 17:37Tough day wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Pittwater 4 wph zip. See you next season.
------------------------------------------
Told you so !
Manly Comp streets ahead of NWSF all the way through.
Rough result
wrote on 25-Sep-22 17:37Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
Lord help us
wrote on 25-Sep-22 19:04brace yourselves for Keith Ken won
kenthurst keith
wrote on 25-Sep-22 19:40your all fat im hearing the ghfa loverboys of west pennent hills gave pittwater some shooting practice today time to put down the coke and pies your playing with the big boys now the bush boys into the next round good bye berowera ghfa come learn a thing or too hills comp still number 1
kenthurst keith
wrote on 25-Sep-22 19:42hills comp better then ghfa comp proven it today how do you go to champeons of champeon and loose 4-0 first round if only they had a walking champens of champeons
Y Man
wrote on 25-Sep-22 20:31Rough result wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.------------------------------------------
Blame it on the Flamingo Pink Goalie attire... from head to toe - all pink.
Result shows
It happens
wrote on 25-Sep-22 20:42kenthurst keith wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>hills comp better then ghfa comp proven it today how do you go to champeons of champeon and loose 4-0 first round if only they had a walking champens of champeons
------------------------------------------
Guess you've forgetten the last CoC, where kenthurst were knocked out in the 1st round 6-1?
I'm tipping Pittwater to take the cup
kenthurst keith
wrote on 25-Sep-22 21:03we should of beaten inter that day they were old lucky to win they were anyway stop living in the past your fat and the bush boys are to lift this cup whats gHfa doing for mad monday shouting the west pennent players a pie and a coke at ryde servo come watch the big boys play
kenthurst keith
wrote on 25-Sep-22 21:04we should of beaten inter that day they were old lucky to win they were anyway stop living in the past your fat and the bush boys are to lift this cup whats gHfa doing for mad monday shouting the west pennent players a pie and a coke at ryde servo come watch the big boys play
New bushies
wrote on 26-Sep-22 06:21Rough result wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
------------------------------------------
Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
"We dominated possession"
"We had more chances but just couldn't finish"
"The other team had 4 shots and scored then all"
They're the new kenthurst
We know
wrote on 26-Sep-22 09:02Said it before and ill say it again.
WPH aren't that good. They aren't a good football side.
very fir, very well drilled and they are cery good at what they do. More than that, they are consistent and deserved winners of our comp
But they are not a good footballing side
Contradict much
wrote on 26-Sep-22 09:18We know wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Said it before and ill say it again.
WPH aren't that good. They aren't a good football side.
very fir, very well drilled and they are cery good at what they do. More than that, they are consistent and deserved winners of our comp
>But they are not a good footballing side
------------------------------------------
"WPH arent that good", well if that's the case, then what does that say about the rest of the competition and presumably your team? Rubbish?
Well drilled and good at what they do. Sounds like they play to their strengths and do it well. Isn't that what it's about? Pittwater wasn't super impressive yesterday but when needed the quality of players that had played at a higher level in their side produced. WPH lacked theri normal fluidity. They weren't bad and 4 shipped was probably reflective of Pittwater quality in front of goal. WPH missed their normal outlet upfront though.
H
wrote on 26-Sep-22 09:52Just a heads up that Berowra Fielded 4 of their normal starting 11 against Kenthurst yesterday.
Wasn't very smart but they booked their end of season trip to Cairns and it took priority over COC's.
Keep thinking Pittwater are nothing special but the keep wining by 3 or 4 goals - that's what it's about !!
Team Short
wrote on 26-Sep-22 09:58Not that it matters but Berowra did field a number of ineligible players.
Cobra
wrote on 26-Sep-22 14:18Berowra last won Prems in the 1960's so .... booked an EOS trip.
Rough result
wrote on 26-Sep-22 17:31New bushies wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Rough result wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
>
------------------------------------------
>Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
>"We dominated possession"
>"We had more chances but just couldn't finish"
>"The other team had 4 shots and scored then all"
>
>They're the new kenthurst
------------------------------------------Not sure WPH players or coaching staff have even written anything about the game. I was there just to watch. Considering they only lost about 3 games this year including this one I reckon you're working off a pretty small sample size!
Rough result
wrote on 26-Sep-22 17:44New bushies wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Rough result wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>>Looked to me like WPH had players missing. Definitely Kane didn't play. WPH controlled large parts of the game but missed chances Kane wouldn't have missed and got punished for every mistake at the other end.
>>Pittwater decent but I expected them to be better. Probably deserves to win but the score was unfortunate.
>
------------------------------------------
>Every time west penno have lost this season they've come in here with a million excuses.
>"We dominated possession"
>"We had more chances but just couldn't finish"
>"The other team had 4 shots and scored then all"
>
>They're the new kenthurst
------------------------------------------Not sure WPH players or coaching staff have even written anything about the game. I was there just to watch. Considering they only lost about 3 games this year including this one I reckon you're working off a pretty small sample size!
M.oliver
wrote on 27-Sep-22 10:24There should be a big pot of money for winning COC
$10K
Hype
wrote on 28-Sep-22 22:27My tip is a Pittwater vs Kirrawee final
Kelly's Heroes
wrote on 10-Oct-22 10:24Hype wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>My tip is a Pittwater vs Kirrawee final
------------------------------------------
your tip went to the tip...
Dusted
wrote on 10-Oct-22 16:22Pittwater pumped 3 zip by glebe imagine what glebe what have done to lions haha
kenthurst keith
wrote on 10-Oct-22 19:48your all fat we marcheing on to the semi finals come down and watch us and take some notes you might learn a thing or too west pennent hills out of the comp for weeks rubbish assosciascion gone backwards since us bush boys have left we carried that premier league now its like a aa5 at best enjoy the pies
Dusted
wrote on 12-Oct-22 15:40Pittwater pumped 3 zip by glebe imagine what glebe what have done to lions haha
sam
wrote on 16-Oct-22 21:12kenthurst keith wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>your all fat we marcheing on to the semi finals come down and watch us and take some notes you might learn a thing or too west pennent hills out of the comp for weeks rubbish assosciascion gone backwards since us bush boys have left we carried that premier league now its like a aa5 at best enjoy the pies
------------------------------------------
sorry Keith
Better luck nxt year
Grass rooted
wrote on 17-Oct-22 20:24Zero NWSF teams into the COC finals... Sutherland have 7...
Thoughts on why the comps are weaker than other districts?
lack of facilities?
lack of good coaches?
shit grounds?
Y Man
wrote on 17-Oct-22 23:12Grass rooted wrote:
------------------------------------------
>
>Zero NWSF teams into the COC finals... Sutherland have 7...
>Thoughts on why the comps are weaker than other districts?
lack of facilities?
lack of good coaches?
>shit grounds?
>
------------------------------------------
Hills' District??
Grass rooted
wrote on 18-Oct-22 06:492 teams