NWSF Annual Survey

Views: 698 Posts: 13
Gobsmacked
wrote on 24-Aug-22 16:47

Anyone else receive the NWSF Annual Survey?

 

Is it just me, or is this survey just focussed on improving female participation? Does NWSF actually acknowledge it has male participants as well or has that gone down the drain since the merge?

All good and well to support female participation, but this is just getting ridiculous from NWSF now...

Everywhere
wrote on 24-Aug-22 19:25

It's all clubs, all associations.

Chasing growth. Go for it, but they need to be a little more aware of the messaging.

watts
wrote on 25-Aug-22 08:11

Maybe a breakaway formenting.  ..

 

A Gladesville Ryde Football association for the southerners - just like the Hills District.

grabbing a few more clubs like Dundas, Ermington, Rydalmere who will be happy to leave Granville

Too big means too hard to manage

Grow up
wrote on 25-Aug-22 10:26

Gobsmacked wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Anyone else receive the NWSF Annual Survey?

>Is it just me, or is this survey just focussed on improving female participation? Does NWSF actually acknowledge it has male participants as well or has that gone down the drain since the merge?

>All good and well to support female participation, but this is just getting ridiculous from NWSF now...


------------------------------------------

 

Here's the survey - https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SYTFML9?fbclid=IwAR0oc_IuheTIC0vATGgQg7iRr0HHDWl3GT-Nd9C8X3HT82Juw9WZsuZVuR0

 

3 specific questions from 30 around female football (questions 27, 28 and 29 I might add), which as has been pointed out, is a focus in all associations as coming down from FFA. I think you're a little precious Gobsmacked. Jog on.

More money
wrote on 25-Aug-22 15:52

This is going to grind some male ego gears 

https://footballfacilities.com.au/2022/08/25/female-facilities-set-to-flourish/?fbclid=IwAR3tknhhy-TglLFq-w7hemA1rrzS9y8GdEpvQdub6LJ5q012MqHTpgL3Nnc

strange
wrote on 26-Aug-22 07:54

More money wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>This is going to grind some male ego gears 

>https://footballfacilities.com.au/2022/08/25/female-facilities-set-to-flourish/?fbclid=IwAR3tknhhy-TglLFq-w7hemA1rrzS9y8GdEpvQdub6LJ5q012MqHTpgL3Nnc


------------------------------------------

any upgrade to football facilities is a good thing for everyone

i dont know what a female friendly changeroom is though

snowdrop
wrote on 26-Aug-22 15:29

>i dont know what a female friendly changeroom is though

 

it's got 22 cubicles

Devilís Advocate
wrote on 26-Aug-22 15:40

Gobsmacked wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Anyone else receive the NWSF Annual Survey?

>Is it just me, or is this survey just focussed on improving female participation? Does NWSF actually acknowledge it has male participants as well or has that gone down the drain since the merge?

>All good and well to support female participation, but this is just getting ridiculous from NWSF now...


------------------------------------------
Women's football is to men's football what A League is to English Premier League: slower, less skilful and tiresome to watch. I'm fine with women's football as long as I'm not forced to watch it.

For those who don't understand what a female-friendly dressing room is: what do you think it might mean? Duh!

Yes there was a bit of a focus on women and A League in the survey. For those who disagree, you may want to read the survey again: if you leave all of your personal details at the end, you get a chance to win a bloody Matilda's shirt! A 'prize' should actually be something people want, like or need.

Now what about the 'theys', 'thems' and 'its' ? Do they get a non-binary dressing room and their own league? Yes? No? Not willing to say ? 

Should clubs have gender neutral barbecues? Let's ban sausages so that we don't offend those who don't have big ones or don't have any but would like to, or are transitioning.

Instead of worrying about all of the above, why not just focus on the most urgent issues in local PL games: poorly-trained referees who need to be closely monitored and corrupt/ stupid club committees that permit foul-mouthed, vindictive substance-abusing untrained morons to pollute the lives of players by claiming to be coaches when clearly they are not. 

Lifeline
wrote on 26-Aug-22 16:08

Devil’s Advocate wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Gobsmacked wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Anyone else receive the NWSF Annual Survey?

>> 

>>Is it just me, or is this survey just focussed on improving female participation? Does NWSF actually acknowledge it has male participants as well or has that gone down the drain since the merge?

>>All good and well to support female participation, but this is just getting ridiculous from NWSF now...

>
------------------------------------------
Women's football is to men's football what A League is to English Premier League: slower, less skilful and tiresome to watch. I'm fine with women's football as long as I'm not forced to watch it.

>For those who don't understand what a female-friendly dressing room is: what do you think it might mean? Duh!

>Yes there was a bit of a focus on women and A League in the survey. For those who disagree, you may want to read the survey again: if you leave all of your personal details at the end, you get a chance to win a bloody Matilda's shirt! A 'prize' should actually be something people want, like or need.

>Now what about the 'theys', 'thems' and 'its' ? Do they get a non-binary dressing room and their own league? Yes? No? Not willing to say ? 

>Should clubs have gender neutral barbecues? Let's ban sausages so that we don't offend those who don't have big ones or don't have any but would like to, or are transitioning.

>Instead of worrying about all of the above, why not just focus on the most urgent issues in local PL games: poorly-trained referees who need to be closely monitored and corrupt/ stupid club committees that permit foul-mouthed, vindictive substance-abusing untrained morons to pollute the lives of players by claiming to be coaches when clearly they are not. 


------------------------------------------

 

Please see someone close to you who can give you a hug. Alternatively, Lifeline Australia Ph 13 11 14. Please call them, you need to talk to someone.

Grow up
wrote on 26-Aug-22 18:51

Devil’s Advocate wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Gobsmacked wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Anyone else receive the NWSF Annual Survey?

>> 

>>Is it just me, or is this survey just focussed on improving female participation? Does NWSF actually acknowledge it has male participants as well or has that gone down the drain since the merge?

>>All good and well to support female participation, but this is just getting ridiculous from NWSF now...

>
------------------------------------------
Women's football is to men's football what A League is to English Premier League: slower, less skilful and tiresome to watch. I'm fine with women's football as long as I'm not forced to watch it.

>For those who don't understand what a female-friendly dressing room is: what do you think it might mean? Duh!

>Yes there was a bit of a focus on women and A League in the survey. For those who disagree, you may want to read the survey again: if you leave all of your personal details at the end, you get a chance to win a bloody Matilda's shirt! A 'prize' should actually be something people want, like or need.

>Now what about the 'theys', 'thems' and 'its' ? Do they get a non-binary dressing room and their own league? Yes? No? Not willing to say ? 

>Should clubs have gender neutral barbecues? Let's ban sausages so that we don't offend those who don't have big ones or don't have any but would like to, or are transitioning.

>Instead of worrying about all of the above, why not just focus on the most urgent issues in local PL games: poorly-trained referees who need to be closely monitored and corrupt/ stupid club committees that permit foul-mouthed, vindictive substance-abusing untrained morons to pollute the lives of players by claiming to be coaches when clearly they are not. 


------------------------------------------

Cry me a fucking river. You actually sound like an incel

Unsilent Majority
wrote on 27-Aug-22 00:51

Laugh all you want but there are no longer any exclusive "mens" comps in the NWSF... have a look there's MIXED and FEMALE... so stop burying your heads in the sand and wake the hell up ffs.

Douche
wrote on 27-Aug-22 12:34

Ok Andrew Tate

Boo hoo
wrote on 27-Aug-22 13:55

Unsilent Majority wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Laugh all you want but there are no longer any exclusive "mens" comps in the NWSF... have a look there's MIXED and FEMALE... so stop burying your heads in the sand and wake the hell up ffs.

------------------------------------------

Omg are you scared of women or something??? Imagine being that much of a snowflake that you have a whinge cause our comp is called mixed not mens. It's a word champion, you'll survive 

Author:
Subject: