Round 19 Results

Views: 1746 Posts: 22
Nigel
wrote on 06-Aug-22 16:11

Results?

Horse
wrote on 06-Aug-22 16:54

STA v RSU 

 

Res 

4-1

 

1sts 

1-0

THE ROCK
wrote on 06-Aug-22 17:16

Hawks v north Epping 

 

Firsts 1-0

Res 5-1

Meadowbank Mattress
wrote on 06-Aug-22 17:28

NMH v WRR

RES 2-3

1st 1-4

Noddy
wrote on 06-Aug-22 17:33

Another stellar defensive performance from North Epping Rangers. Can't wait to see them parking the bus in Super League.

Covers
wrote on 06-Aug-22 17:37

Wph v pen

ressie 4-0

Firsts 3-1

Normo = Dog Water
wrote on 06-Aug-22 20:37

Normo are absolute dog water. I've never seen such a floppy inconsistent team 

Gross
wrote on 06-Aug-22 21:33

Horse wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>STA v RSU 

>Res 

>4-1

>1sts 

>1-0


------------------------------------------

Couldn't even get a shutout against a ressies team full of all age and 035s

How funny

2023
wrote on 06-Aug-22 23:20

st pats promoted.. only took them 36 attempts

Better comp
wrote on 07-Aug-22 07:44

Should bring st Pat's and Ravens up and get rid of North epping and saints

Ideas
wrote on 07-Aug-22 09:52

Better comp wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Should bring st Pat's and Ravens up and get rid of North epping and saints


------------------------------------------

If you were going to do that you should play 9th PL Vs 2nd SL in a playoff 

Nigel no friends
wrote on 07-Aug-22 10:40

Nigel wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Results?


------------------------------------------

Nigel, you need to add more value

Dogs Dinner
wrote on 07-Aug-22 11:49

Great bring those 2 up and play at meadowbank 10 and peel park.

NO THANKS.

 I'd rather play at north Epping.

Agree
wrote on 07-Aug-22 13:28

Dogs Dinner wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Great bring those 2 up and play at meadowbank 10 and peel park.

>NO THANKS.

> I'd rather play at north Epping.


------------------------------------------
agree!

 

 

Imposters
wrote on 07-Aug-22 15:04

Looks like we're seeing what would have happenned to the Dragons if the 2nd half of the season were to be played out last year..

3 losses and a draw in their last 5... Very poor, they'll be hard pressed to even make the top 4 since last game is against WPH and 3 teams in the running to take their spot.

Old…
wrote on 07-Aug-22 19:42

That argument is getting old. Don't know which club you're from (probably not in the top 4 last year) but you're still salty and holding on to that? Let'em play. They definitely haven't backed it up from last year but they're still in the top half of the table which you would say is decent in the 2nd year of prems for a promoted team. Let's get back to the topic at hand...bashing saints and NER! 

kenthurst keith
wrote on 07-Aug-22 21:10

whose getting relugated this year should relugate the hole comp wouldnt survive in aa4 over in the hills where the real football is even baulkam hills would win your comp and whose the idiot using my name in the other post if my dog had an a head like yours id shave its arse and teach it to walk backwards you overgrown wombat

Sad
wrote on 07-Aug-22 22:33

Kenthurst Keith....as in the team that got spanked by Norwest on the weekend? Or the team that can't even win the farmers league hills comp? Surely it's not both?

Season over Keith
wrote on 07-Aug-22 23:32

You keep harping on about how crap our comp is Keith. I'd love to see WPH thump the bush pigs to shut you up but seeing as you aren't going to even make CoC that isn't going to happen is it.

Season over you donut munching loser.

Imposters
wrote on 08-Aug-22 18:44

Old… wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>That argument is getting old. Don't know which club you're from (probably not in the top 4 last year) but you're still salty and holding on to that? Let'em play. They definitely haven't backed it up from last year but they're still in the top half of the table which you would say is decent in the 2nd year of prems for a promoted team. Let's get back to the topic at hand...bashing saints and NER! 


------------------------------------------

 

Not holding on to anything, just making an observation (you must be from Dragons with that reply) that true championship winning teams need to have the quality and squad depth to perform well through the entirety of a season, not just the halfway point lol

Devil’s Advocate
wrote on 08-Aug-22 20:01

Imposters wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Old… wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>That argument is getting old. Don't know which club you're from (probably not in the top 4 last year) but you're still salty and holding on to that? Let'em play. They definitely haven't backed it up from last year but they're still in the top half of the table which you would say is decent in the 2nd year of prems for a promoted team. Let's get back to the topic at hand...bashing saints and NER! 

>
------------------------------------------

>Not holding on to anything, just making an observation (you must be from Dragons with that reply) that true championship winning teams need to have the quality and squad depth to perform well through the entirety of a season, not just the halfway point lol


------------------------------------------

It looks as though Dragons have upset a lot of people given how much they're talked about on this forum. Is it just because they won last year and haven't backed it up? I didn't think they were any grubbier or dirty than any other team we've played this season, but presumably other teams have experienced something different?

Anyway, to play devil's advocate, it could be argued that their squad depth has improved since last year, given their ressies finished 2nd or 3rd from bottom in 2021 and are now sitting top 2. I don't think they've stacked their ressies either, at least based on the line ups in both rounds against us.

Move on
wrote on 08-Aug-22 20:11

Imposters wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Old… wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>That argument is getting old. Don't know which club you're from (probably not in the top 4 last year) but you're still salty and holding on to that? Let'em play. They definitely haven't backed it up from last year but they're still in the top half of the table which you would say is decent in the 2nd year of prems for a promoted team. Let's get back to the topic at hand...bashing saints and NER! 

>
------------------------------------------

>Not holding on to anything, just making an observation (you must be from Dragons with that reply) that true championship winning teams need to have the quality and squad depth to perform well through the entirety of a season, not just the halfway point lol


------------------------------------------

Not from Dragons mate. We beat them so I don't need to join them either. I'm just seeing things objectively and people like you need to get over it. It wasn't their fault they were awarded the title. They won't win it this year and that's fine. I think you and all of us just need to move on. 

Author:
Subject: